An Apple A Day… Proactive Steps Your Company Should Take to Weather the Economical Storm

On October 5, 2008 by

We’ve all heard the adage “an apple a day keeps the doctor away,” but we rarely hear any similar quips regarding lawyers. However, the same principal is absolutely true. Taking proactive measures to insulate your company from liability can prevent future costly (and possibly fatal) lawsuits or legal disputes.

In the construction industry where litigation is frequent and costly, legal preparations are especially important. And while you can never completely isolate your organization from legal exposure, it will benefit from a conscious effort to place it in the best possible situation in the event of a dispute or injury.

Here are some ways your organization can be legally proactive to avoid costly and unnecessary legal expenses in 2008 and 2009:

1) Have a great written contract. Entering into a construction project of any size without a written contract is a recipe for disaster.

Your organization should have a “form contract” that meets your business’ requirements, and addresses certain legal hot topics such as the scope of work, the indemnity requirements, the obligations of each party in the project, dispute resolution mechanics and procedures, etc. Written contracts should be a way of life for your organization, with contracts executed between contractor and owner, contractor and subcontractor, contractor and supplier, owner and architect, etc.

An attorney should be consulted to help make changes and insert provisions as required project-by-project, as each project has different needs. Even AIA or ConsensusDOCS form contracts are frequently edited by the parties to accommodate the needs of a particular project or agreement.

In the event of a dispute, a well-drafted written agreement can save your organizations thousands, and even hundreds of thousands or millions depending on the project’s size.

2) Never Sign A Bad Contract. This is particularly a problem with subcontractors who enter into written contracts with subs or GCs who are larger and better funded then themselves. In these situations, it is common for the larger party to present the smaller party with a very one-sided contract.

The larger contractor uses its size and the allure of the project to strong-arm the smaller entity into agreement. Be very weary of this type of practice.

In the event of a dispute under one of these unilateral contracts, your organization can sustain a fatal blow. In our experience, we’ve unfortunately witnesses companies who have had to file bankruptcy or dissolve themselves not because their work was poor or they were legally wrong, but because they just couldn’t afford to fight their position under the contract.

One proactive measure your organization can take to avoid costly litigation is to avoid signing these types of agreements.

While the heavy-handed form contract might seem mandatory, in fact these corporations are usually used to making certain changes to the contract terms. Have an attorney consult with you regarding the consequences of the contract provisions, as well as suggested changes – and propose these changes to the other party.

If you cannot get the contract altered to meet your concerns, you may want to seriously consider whether the project is worth the risk in liability and exposure.

3) Create and Follow In-House Collection Procedures. The importance of your in-house collection procedures will vary depending on the type of construction business you run. Certainly if your organization enters into hundreds or thousands of smaller contracts every year, collection procedures will be very critical to your operation. Conversely, if your organization has just a few big contracts each year, collections are likely more under control.

In any event, your organization should have a clear “plan of attack” in the event of non-payment.

In today’s construction market and vulnerable economy, credit applications are often denied and cash flow can be tight. A high accounts receivables number can cause displeasure to your company.

The most effective way to prevent bad collection scenarios is not litigation (which is costly), but consistent collection practices and pre-litigation preparation.

Of course, a non-paying client can warrant litigation – and should, if payment is not tendered after collection procedures are employed. However, by taking in-house or outsourced collection measures prior to litigation your organization can limit the number of lawsuits required, and by preparing for litigation in each non-payment scenario, your organization will decrease the overall amount spent in court.

Collection procedures are most effective when they are structured, consistent, and employed early. By sending prompt demand letters you accomplish two important things: (a) you let the non-paying client know you are serious about collecting the account; and (b) you start the clock to collect attorneys fees, interests, etc. that you may be qualified for under contract or by law.

 

On Oct 05, 2008

by

  • Legal Solutions for Contractors in Troubled Times Proactive & Reactive Tips – a 2 Part Series

    The current financial crisis in America is hitting national organizations, banking intuitions and Wall Street – but it is not a recent phenomenon for those who earn a living in the construction industry. While the 90s and early 2000s saw…